|
Post by Stardrifter on Mar 5, 2013 19:52:00 GMT -5
Lane's charade being pointless and needlessly complicated: Sure you may explain it, but I see no explanation that wouldn't be contrived. If you had an explanation, I think you should have offered it.
Calling the robot HAMMER and then Metallo: This just confuses the reader for no reason. Again, if you had some reason to do it, you should have explained it. Honestly, what reason would you have as a storyteller to change the name of something mid story without explaining it?
Lane and Luthor knowing Clark's secret: This is a huge deal and not something you push aside for later. At least the issue should have ended on a cliffhanger mentioning it.
Perhaps plot hole was the wrong wording. Poor plotting may be more accurate. These are things that either should have been addressed this issue or shouldn't have been done. Those choices took me out of the story and left me as the reader not to question, "I wonder where this is going!" but rather, "I wonder what the author is thinking?"
|
|
|
Post by liquidsword34 on Mar 5, 2013 20:20:01 GMT -5
A mystery is all well and good, but when there's so many packed into the story that we can't keep track and they never seem to get answered it's not enjoyable for the reader.
|
|